Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Euro Surveill ; 27(49)2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2162861

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) presented a unique opportunity for the World Health Organization (WHO) to utilise public health intelligence (PHI) for pandemic response. WHO systematically captured mainly unstructured information (e.g. media articles, listservs, community-based reporting) for public health intelligence purposes. WHO used the Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources (EIOS) system as one of the information sources for PHI. The processes and scope for PHI were adapted as the pandemic evolved and tailored to regional response needs. During the early months of the pandemic, media monitoring complemented official case and death reporting through the International Health Regulations mechanism and triggered alerts. As the pandemic evolved, PHI activities prioritised identifying epidemiological trends to supplement the information available through indicator-based surveillance reported to WHO. The PHI scope evolved over time to include vaccine introduction, emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, unusual clinical manifestations and upsurges in cases, hospitalisation and death incidences at subnational levels. Triaging the unprecedented high volume of information challenged surveillance activities but was managed by collaborative information sharing. The evolution of PHI activities using multiple sources in WHO's response to the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates the future directions in which PHI methodologies could be developed and used.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Public Health , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics/prevention & control , World Health Organization , Intelligence
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 149: e261, 2021 05 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1647899

ABSTRACT

Epidemic intelligence activities are undertaken by the WHO Regional Office for Africa to support member states in early detection and response to outbreaks to prevent the international spread of diseases. We reviewed epidemic intelligence activities conducted by the organisation from 2017 to 2020, processes used, key results and how lessons learned can be used to strengthen preparedness, early detection and rapid response to outbreaks that may constitute a public health event of international concern. A total of 415 outbreaks were detected and notified to WHO, using both indicator-based and event-based surveillance. Media monitoring contributed to the initial detection of a quarter of all events reported. The most frequent outbreaks detected were vaccine-preventable diseases, followed by food-and-water-borne diseases, vector-borne diseases and viral haemorrhagic fevers. Rapid risk assessments generated evidence and provided the basis for WHO to trigger operational processes to provide rapid support to member states to respond to outbreaks with a potential for international spread. This is crucial in assisting member states in their obligations under the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005). Member states in the region require scaled-up support, particularly in preventing recurrent outbreaks of infectious diseases and enhancing their event-based surveillance capacities with automated tools and processes.


Subject(s)
Epidemics/prevention & control , Public Health Surveillance/methods , World Health Organization/organization & administration , Africa/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Global Health , Humans , Risk Assessment
3.
Int J Infect Dis ; 104: 746-751, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1042532

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Event-based surveillance and rapid risk assessment for acute public health events are essential in emerging infectious disease control. Since detecting the unusual signal in Wuhan in December 2019, Taiwan has been aligning risk management to policy planning via conducting regular risk assessments to combat the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This article aims to provide some insights into Taiwan's experiences and corresponding actions for the outbreak. RESULTS: The COVID-19 risk level in Taiwan was raised to "moderate-to-high" in mid-January 2020 when neighboring countries had reported cases and the human-to-human transmission became obvious. The risk level became "high" on 24 January due to China's escalating epidemic situation and imposed a lockdown in Wuhan. We learned that the commander recognized the importance of risk assessments and considered advice from the experts was crucial in making the correct decision at the early stage of the crisis. CONCLUSIONS: Given the surge of COVID-19 cases globally, understanding the evidence-driven mobilizations via detailed risk assessments in Taiwan may be an example worth considering for other countries. We believe that strengthening a global epidemic intelligence network and sharing information in a timely and transparent manner are essential for confronting new challenges of COVID-19 and other emerging infectious diseases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/transmission , Humans , Public Health , Taiwan/epidemiology
4.
East Mediterr Health J ; 26(12): 1570-1575, 2020 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-995096

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the 2019 Hajj, the Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia implemented for the first time a health early warning system for rapid detection and response to health threats. AIMS: This study aimed to describe the early warning findings at the Hajj to highlight the pattern of health risks and the potential benefits of the disease surveillance system. METHODS: Using syndromic surveillance and event-based surveillance data, the health early warning system generated automated alarms for public health events, triggered alerts for rapid epidemiological investigations and facilitated the monitoring of health events. RESULTS: During the deployment period (4 July-31 August 2019), a total of 121 automated alarms were generated, of which 2 events (heat-related illnesses and injuries/trauma) were confirmed by the response teams. CONCLUSION: The surveillance system potentially improved the timeliness and situational awareness for health events, including non-infectious threats. In the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, a health early warning system could enhance case detection and facilitate monitoring of the disease geographical spread and the effectiveness of control measures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Islam , Public Health Administration/methods , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Crowding , Health Planning/organization & administration , Humans , Mass Behavior , Mediterranean Region/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Sentinel Surveillance , Travel
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL